Yesterday, I gave you the following information:
In 1969, Cat. 5 Hurricane Camille struck the Louisiana-Mississippi border and produced a deadly storm surge of 24 feet. Almost 40 years later, Cat. 3 Hurricane Katrina, following almost the exact same path and landfall point as Camille, produced a record storm surge of nearly 30 feet in the same area!
And then I asked:
How did Hurricane Katrina, a Cat. 3 at landfall, obliterate Cat. 5 Hurricane Camille’s surge record?
a) Katrina was much larger than Camille and had been a Cat. 5 prior to landfall.
b) Katrina made landfall in a high tide cycle while Camille made landfall in a low tide cycle.
c) Intense development in the Gulf Coast Region between 1969 and 2005 lowered the mean elevation of the coast, making it more vulnerable to surge.
Thanks to all who participated in my second hurricane trivia poll question of this season! Congratulations to those of you who chose the correct answer, “a”.
This was intended to be a tough question!
Many of you responded “b” – and I understand your thinking. Tide cycles do matter, at least marginally, in storm surge situations. However, Gulf Coast tide levels typically fluctuate a mere 1 to 3 feet from low to high cycles – not enough to account for the 25% increase in storm surge Katrina produced over Camille.
Most of you did not answer “c”, but it might have been attractive to you in that it fits with the narrative that man adversely alters nature. Studies have suggested that, at least in Louisiana, manmade levees built to divert Mississippi River floodwaters have compromised the coastal wetlands of the Mississippi Delta Region. But, less wetlands cannot account for the six foot increase in storm surge in Katrina over Camille. What’s more, Mississippi’s coast is independent of Louisiana’s levees. The great increase in storm surge Katrina brought to Mississippi would have happened regardless of how many homes, hotels or casinos came to the state’s coast since 1969.
Indeed, “a” is the best answer. The magnitude of a storm’s surge is directly dependent on the strength of the hurricane’s wind and the size of the hurricane’s wind field. Despite Katrina’s Category 3 landfall status (with winds between 111mph and 130mph), the storm had been a monstrous Category 5 hurricane (with winds greater than 155mph) just 24 hours before it came ashore. And not only was Katrina strong, it was enormous. Satellite estimates and other data suggest that Katrina’s hurricane-force wind field was at least twice the aerial size of Camille’s. Katrina was able to amass an incredible storm surge in its trek across the Gulf of Mexico.
Thanks again for your participation in hurricane trivia!
